#GENITAL JOUSTING PEER TO PEER FREE#

As a few historians point out, Joan was launched into leadership by a powerful ruling family, the House of Anjou, which had no problems with women warriors and protected her as long as they were able. How, in a society that was still essentially Catholic, did Joan of Arc reach the dizzying status of a maid in armor and reign there for a whole year, only to be dragged to a horrifying death as a heretic for wearing that same armor? Is there more to her controversy than the story we get from standard history? She saw herself as a woman leading a soldier’s life in order to carry out her divine mission. Joan expressed no interest in changing her gender or passing as a man. If so, she and her contemporaries-given the state of 15th-century medical knowledge-had no idea that this was the case. The more I study Joan’s life, the more I suspect she was a case of complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS). But all these viewpoints converge on one fact: in 1431, Joan’s male clothing, and her insistence that God told her to wear it, became the pretext to burn her at the stake. She is variously pegged as heterosexual, lesbian, and transgender/intersex. A few historians aver that her links with the “bloodline of Jesus” need to be examined. The Roman Church claims her as a champion of Catholic nationalism, while Protestants insist she was one of the first Protestants. Today, historians and commentators still argue fiercely about Joan. Because a peer-reviewed journal will not publish articles that fail to meet the standards established for a given discipline, peer-reviewed articles that are accepted for publication exemplify the best research practices in a field.CONTROVERSY about Joan of Arc’s gender first exploded in 1428, and its shock wave has kept rolling for nearly 600 years.If they find the article lacking in scholarly validity and rigor, they reject it. The peer reviewers check the manuscript for accuracy and assess the validity of the research methodology and procedures. These impartial reviewers are charged with carefully evaluating the quality of the submitted manuscript. Because the reviewers specialize in the same scholarly area as the author, they are considered the author’s peers. Before an article is deemed appropriate to be published in a peer-reviewed journal, it must undergo the following process:The author of the article must submit it to the journal editor who forwards the article to experts in the field. peer review is to assess the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Peer review journls on Genital System is a aims to publish the most complete and reliable source of information on the discoveries and current developments.

#GENITAL JOUSTING PEER TO PEER FREE#

In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge,will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. The journal will publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates. Peer review journal on genital system will cover all aspects human reproduction including Andrology, Assisted conception, Endocrinology, Physiology and Pathology, Implantation, Preimplantation Diagnosis, Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Embryology as well as Ethical, Legal and Social issues.

Genital jousting peer to peer